Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0955

reference
313-tree-1
name
0955
tree-preservation-order

undefined

313-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.018839 50.866597)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.018797 50.866592,-1.018799 50.866601,-1.018805 50.866608,-1.018814 50.866614,-1.018826 50.866618,-1.018839 50.866620,-1.018864 50.866615,-1.018874 50.866609,-1.018880 50.866601,-1.018882 50.866593,-1.018880 50.866585,-1.018874 50.866577,-1.018865 50.866571,-1.018853 50.866567,-1.018840 50.866566,-1.018827 50.866567,-1.018805 50.866576,-1.018799 50.866584,-1.018797 50.866592)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL